<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alec's thoughts &#187; advocacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flett.org/category/advocacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flett.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why NOT to eat organic</title>
		<link>http://www.flett.org/2005/10/05/why-not-to-eat-organic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flett.org/2005/10/05/why-not-to-eat-organic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advocacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flett.org/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back I was exercising my writing, trying to find an voice for this blog, and wrote Why to shop organic. A friend of mine recently gave me a hard time about it and through a funny confluence of events, I found two reasons not to eat organic.
Reason number one: Probably the reason Heather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back I was exercising my writing, trying to find an voice for this blog, and wrote <a href="http://www.flett.org/2003/05/18/why-to-shop-organic/">Why to shop organic</a>. A friend of mine recently gave me a hard time about it and through a funny confluence of events, I found two reasons <em>not</em> to eat organic.</p>
<p>Reason number one: Probably the reason Heather used to call organic strawberries &#8220;armpit fruit&#8221;:<br />
<a href="javascript:void(window.open('/wp-content/worm.jpg','width=640,height=480'))"><br />
<img src='/wp-content/thumb-worm.jpg' alt='Artichoke' /></a><br />
Yes, that is a dead worm in my artichoke. Yes, I had to eat this far to discover it. <img src='http://www.flett.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Reason number two: Sure they don&#8217;t use pesticides, but I don&#8217;t want babies working the fields any more than I want 12 year olds making my shirts.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:void(window.open('/wp-content/earthgrains.jpg','width=800,height=600'))"><br />
<img src='/wp-content/thumb-earthgrains.jpg' alt='Organic Rice Cereal Box' /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flett.org/2005/10/05/why-not-to-eat-organic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andy Rooney on Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.flett.org/2005/10/03/andy-rooney-on-iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flett.org/2005/10/03/andy-rooney-on-iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advocacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flett.org/2005/10/03/andy-rooney-on-iraq/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never thought I&#8217;d be sending around something that took Andy Rooney seriously, but this morning I ran into a post on BoingBoing that blew me away. Last night Andy Rooney&#8217;s segment on 60 minutes (BitTorrent link) blasted the Iraq effort in a way that I think much of Middle America can understand: basic facts. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I&#8217;d be sending around something that took Andy Rooney seriously, but this morning I ran into <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2005/10/03/andy_rooney_has_a_po.html">a post on BoingBoing</a> that blew me away. Last night <a href="http://www.wakahiru-me.com/media/vid/cbs/cbs_60min_andy_rooney_iraq_war_051002a.mov">Andy Rooney&#8217;s segment</a> on 60 minutes (<a href="http://torrent.crooksandliars.com/60%20Minutes-AR-cost-of-the-war-10-2.mov.torrent">BitTorrent link</a>) blasted the Iraq effort in a way that I think much of Middle America can understand: basic facts. (Also see the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/09/30/60minutes/main892398.shtml">transcript</a>. </p>
<p>I have a theory that many more people would be against the Iraq war and more critical of the Whitehouse administration if they simply understood the implications for this country. For example, I wonder how many people know that our budget this year for defense is $336 billion, yet our educational budget is $61 billion? I wonder how many people would support the simplest proposal of say, cutting $30 billion from the defense budget in order to increase the education budget by a whopping 50%?</p>
<p>And so I can&#8217;t begin to express how pleased I am that someone like Andy Rooney, who is typically viewed as fairly harmless, suddenly has become so vocally critical of the war. I think the mainstream media finally got some backbone with their outrage over the handling of Katrina, but I&#8217;m going to predict that Andy Rooney&#8217;s segment yesterday is a turning point for public criticism of the war and this administration. I think this changes the face of opposition. I think for many people it all sounds like the just the rantings of some that crazy mom Cindy Sheehan, or some crazy Californians who are too disconnected from the real world to have a legitimate voice, or some vocal celebrities jumping on the bandwagon of rebelliousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flett.org/2005/10/03/andy-rooney-on-iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.wakahiru-me.com/media/vid/cbs/cbs_60min_andy_rooney_iraq_war_051002a.mov" length="4784619" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why to shop organic</title>
		<link>http://www.flett.org/2003/05/18/why-to-shop-organic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flett.org/2003/05/18/why-to-shop-organic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2003 03:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advocacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flett.org/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent discussion with my friend Ross, we discussed the idea of paying more for organic food. The discussion involved why one should pay more than you do for normal food. As we do sometimes, Ross was the sceptic and I played the part of the organic crunchy guy. 
The problem breaks down into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent discussion with my friend Ross, we discussed the idea of paying more for organic food. The discussion involved why one should pay more than you do for normal food. As we do sometimes, Ross was the sceptic and I played the part of the organic crunchy guy. </p>
<p>The problem breaks down into two problems really: Why should you buy organic, and then, seperately, why should you be willing to spend more money, sometimes signifigantly more.</p>
<p>First, I discuss my personal reasons why one should buy organic, and focus on health.<br />
<span id="more-4"></span><br />
One argument for buying organic is for your health. In reading Fast Food Nation, I have become increasingly aware of where honest natural flavors are entering my body and where I&#8217;m simply being fooled by chemical flavoring. In addition, excess chemicals used for preservatives, texture, and appearance further complicate the chemical balance of your food. For the purposes of discussion, I&#8217;ll focus on the chemicals used in flavoring, but the argument applies to any of these other &#8220;enhancements.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fast Food Nation explains that by the FDA&#8217;s own definition, artificial and natural flavoring are both created by artificial means. Having chemicals in your food is not in itself inherently evil &#8211; many of these chemicals do in fact exist in all natural food. What is discomforting is that you are introducing additional chemicals that would not have otherwise entered your body with that particular food. These &#8220;chemicals&#8221; in themselves may or may not be harmful, but the issue  is that your body evolved to process specific proportions of protiens, carbs, and fats, along with specific proportions of vitamins and minerals. Your body has will absorb the proper nutritional content based on these proportions. When you muck with them, you muck with your own system for absorbing nutrition.</p>
<p>Organic food consists of either raw food such as vegetables and grains, or combinations of these raw foods, without excess processing. What this means is that when you eat organic granola, you are ingesting the specific balance of nutrients that naturally occurs in each ingredient of the granola. </p>
<p>For example, according to Dan Benaroot in Nutrition for Serious Atheletes, iron is more easily absorbed when eaten in meat. Vegetables have oxalic acid, which &#8220;reduces iron availability.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know much about the specific chemicals involved in flavoring, but just suppose oxalic acid was something that made hamburgers taste better &#8211; perhaps enhancing the &#8220;grilled&#8221; flavor, or making the burger taste less oily. If this chemical were added to your meat, the meat would become less nutritious! This is of course entirely based on supposition, but I think it illustrates the concept well. As the human race has evolved to survive at least into the last century, our bodies are naturally geared towards the existing chemical balance that exists in unenhanced food. Flavor companies are not trying to enhance the nutritional value of the food they are flavoring. They are often working independent of nutritional value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flett.org/2003/05/18/why-to-shop-organic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
